I Have A New Cause
Friday, March 16th, 2007Big Shocker, right?!?! I am so tired of all the coverage. I am tired of the LIES. I am tired of the HYPE. I am tired of the PROJECTED FEAR that my kids will cook alive on the surface of our planet if we don’t “do something now”.
I’ve written about global warming quite a bit. You can see past articles of mine here,
here, and
here. I am a skeptic. Anyone who dares bring up this issue in my presence is asking for an earful of Dan’s opinion. Well thats the problem, isn’t it. It’s my opinion, right? Wrong.
I studied science in elementary, middle, and high school. I studied science and engineering for my undergraduate degree and I am now studying them for my masters degree. One thing that has been drilled into my head over and over during those years of study is the scientific method. For those of you that don’t remember, the scientific method was a set of steps a scientist should perform to create/validate ideas. It was created to help make sure that thoroughness has been attained. From wikipedia:
The scientific method involves the following basic facets:
* Observation. A constant feature of scientific inquiry.
* Description. Information must be reliable, i.e., replicable (repeatable) as well as valid (relevant to the inquiry).
* Prediction. Information must be valid for observations past, present, and future of given phenomena, i.e., purported “one shot” phenomena do not give rise to the capability to predict, nor to the ability to repeat an experiment.
* Control. Actively and fairly sampling the range of possible occurrences, whenever possible and proper, as opposed to the passive acceptance of opportunistic data, is the best way to control or counterbalance the risk of empirical bias.
* Falsifiability, or the elimination of plausible alternatives. This is a gradual process that requires repeated experiments by multiple researchers who must be able to replicate results in order to corroborate them. This requirement, one of the most frequently contended, leads to the following: All hypotheses and theories are in principle subject to disproof. Thus, there is a point at which there might be a consensus about a particular hypothesis or theory, yet it must in principle remain tentative. As a body of knowledge grows and a particular hypothesis or theory repeatedly brings predictable results, confidence in the hypothesis or theory increases.
* Causal explanation. Many scientists and theorists on scientific method argue that concepts of causality are not obligatory to science, but are in fact well-defined only under particular, admittedly widespread conditions. Under these conditions the following requirements are generally regarded as important to scientific understanding:
* Identification of causes. Identification of the causes of a particular phenomenon to the best achievable extent.
* Covariation of events. The hypothesized causes must correlate with observed effects.
* Time-order relationship. The hypothesized causes must precede the observed effects in time.
Ok. That is pretty complicated so I’ll dumb it down for you. Here is the interpretation for laypeople:
# 1. Observe some aspect of the universe.
# 2. Invent a tentative description, called a hypothesis, that is consistent with what you have observed.
# 3. Use the hypothesis to make predictions.
# 4. Test those predictions by experiments or further observations and modify the hypothesis in the light of your results.
# 5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until there are no discrepancies between theory and experiment and/or observation.
I have spent a lot of time researching available data and reading articles. I have watched Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. I have watched all the specials on TV that warn of our impending doom. All these programs have done is further convince me that the arguments presented in favor of man-made global warming vigorously violate the principles of the scientific method.
I wanted to create a place where I can compile all my “skeptics” information. Materials I can use to point people to the fact that this is all a big lie. I also wanted a place where I can summarize my beliefs.
With that said, I have created a new section of the loPEZ Dispenser called Dan’s Skeptic Guide To Global Warming. You can access by on the page with the same title under the Navigation header in the right panel of this site.
Feel free to comment and discuss. And now for our second poll:
[poll=3]